A false positive is where your dialler thought that a call was answered by an answering machine, but actually it was a live person. As far as the person called is concerned, you've just called them, then hung up as soon as they answered, which is just the kind of behaviour that consumers dislike, and what Ofcom's trying to protect them from.
Unfortunately, Ofcom's statement doesn't define what a "reasoned estimate" might be. Unless you rely on the manufacturer's statistics (which might be dangerous - you probably want to check it wasn't done in 1989 when answering machines crackled a lot more than they do today), you will have to listen to some recordings that your dialler thought were answering machines and count how many of them were really people. But how accurate does your AMD have to be?
It turns out the answer is "very accurate". Say you have a campaign with 40% answering machines and 20% live connections, and a 99% accurate AMD system. This would generate 4 silent calls in 1000 dial attempts (1% of 400 calls classified as answering machines turn out to be people). Thats 4 out of the 6 (3% of 200 live connections) you can make without exceeding the target. To take these silent calls into consideration, you need to turn your abandon call target to only allow 2 abandoned calls. To do that, you need to set an abandon call target of only 1% (and that's with a proven 99% acurate AMD system!). Most predictive diallers, will struggle to give you good performance with this target. If the AMD is 98% acurate it will generate 8 silent calls, 2 more than you're allowed, and you might get fined no matter what you set the abandon call target value to.
So how accurate is your AMD system, and how can you work it out? The best way todo this is to listen to some recordings. Take a sample of all the recordings where the dialler thought it had called an answering machine, and count the ones which weren't.
The next question is: How many calls do we need to listen to for a "reasoned estimate" of our AMD's accuracy? Well, it's not terribly clear what a "reasoned estimate" should be, but in the academic and scientific worlds, "95% certain" is the usual test.
It's not often that I get to use my Maths degree (it's a standing joke in Callmedia that I can't do basic arithmetic despite having studied maths), so when Rufus challenged me to find an answer to this question, I enjoyed solving it.
The way to work this out is by analogy with tossing coins. If I toss a coin 100 times, then (assuming it's a fair coin), we can expect roughly 50 heads and 50 tails. Of course, I'm unlikely to get exactly 50 heads and 50 tails, it's more likely to be 46/54 or 42/58 or something like that. Certainly if I get 100 heads, I can be pretty sure that the coin's not fair.
So somewhere between 0/100 and 50/50 (or the other way around), there must be some point above which I think the coin is likely to be fair, and below which I can be fairly certain it's not.
The standard threshold used is "two standard deviations", or roughly 95% - that's the threshold where I can be 95% certain that the coin is fair. And it can be calculated fairly easily (I wrote a computer program to do it for me though, because adding up isn't my strongest point).
It turns out that if you listen to 100 calls, and 1 of them turns out to be a false positives, than you can be 95% certain that the real false positive rate is less than 3%. If you listen to 1000 calls and get 10 false positives, you still can't be reasonably certain the real false postive rate is less than 1.5%. You have to listen to 10,000 recordings (and get 100 false positives) to be fairly sure it's less than 1.17%. That's going to take a lot of time.
The bottom line is: your AMD has to be incredibly accurate to work under the new rules, and to be sure it's that good, you're going to have to listen to an awful lot of calls - several thousand at least. It might be time to ask if you really need AMD after all?
If you want to work out how many recordings you need to listen to to be 95% certain of your AMD accuracy leave a comment. If there's enough interest, we'll turn our calculator into a web-based applet.
David Groves
Product Marketing Director
Callmedia